Difference between revisions of "Industrial Applications of Self-organizing Systems"
From Self-Organization Wiki
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
===What is missing?=== | ===What is missing?=== | ||
| − | |||
* Research is there; sometimes too advanced | * Research is there; sometimes too advanced | ||
* Communication between industrial and academic needs to be improved | * Communication between industrial and academic needs to be improved | ||
| Line 34: | Line 33: | ||
** Who is control up to in the end? | ** Who is control up to in the end? | ||
** Timeliness and external constraints (regulation) | ** Timeliness and external constraints (regulation) | ||
| − | |||
===Success stories=== | ===Success stories=== | ||
Revision as of 16:01, 11 July 2011
Contents
Task description
- Discuss the need for self-organizing systems in industrial applications
- Give examples of success stories/potentials
- What is missing to "make things work"?
Results
Industrial View
- Collaboration has to improve the Business Case
- Return on investment
- Someone has to pay for it
- Add value
- Who is in control up to in the end?
Basis for collaboration
- Bring together industry and academia
- Two different languages
- Partnerships
- Early transfer to the industry
- NOTE: easier to justify than in the industry
- Present a benefit to the industry: way to make money
- New concepts difficult to accept; conservativeness
- Common set of working assumptions
- The power of a business plan
- Do not switch research agenda
What is missing?
- Research is there; sometimes too advanced
- Communication between industrial and academic needs to be improved
- Research Days
- Open questions:
- Who is control up to in the end?
- Timeliness and external constraints (regulation)
Success stories
- LTE?!
- Power distribution
- Internet-based industrial applications
- Vehicular networking
