Difference between revisions of "Industrial Applications of Self-organizing Systems"
From Self-Organization Wiki
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
* Research is there; sometimes too advanced | * Research is there; sometimes too advanced | ||
| − | * Communication between | + | * Communication between industrial and academic needs to be improved |
** Research Days | ** Research Days | ||
* Open questions: | * Open questions: | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
*LTE?! | *LTE?! | ||
*Power distribution | *Power distribution | ||
| + | *Internet-based industrial applications | ||
| + | *Vehicular networking | ||
Revision as of 14:58, 11 July 2011
Contents
Task description
- Discuss the need for self-organizing systems in industrial applications
- Give examples of success stories/potentials
- What is missing to "make things work"?
Results
Industrial View
- Collaboration has to improve the Business Case
- Return on investment
- Someone has to pay for it
- Add value
- Who is in control up to in the end?
Basis for collaboration
- Bring together industry and academia
- Two different languages
- Partnerships
- Early transfer to the industry
- NOTE: easier to justify than in the industry
- Present a benefit to the industry: way to make money
- New concepts difficult to accept; conservativeness
- Common set of working assumptions
- The power of a business plan
- Do not switch research agenda
What is missing?
- Research is there; sometimes too advanced
- Communication between industrial and academic needs to be improved
- Research Days
- Open questions:
- Who is control up to in the end?
- Timeliness and external constraints (regulation)
Success stories
- LTE?!
- Power distribution
- Internet-based industrial applications
- Vehicular networking
