Difference between revisions of "Multi-UAV system design"
From Self-Organization Wiki
m (→what are the building blocks of an autonomous multi-UAV system) |
(→Killer Problems/Enabling factors) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
=== Definitions === | === Definitions === | ||
*Autonomy | *Autonomy | ||
− | ** | + | ** Executing tasks within a certain constrained area |
− | ** | + | ** Scale from complete pilot control to complete uav control for decission making |
− | ** | + | ** Autonomy can be defined for various scopes ( from the individual robot to a whole system including the operators) |
− | *** | + | *** A pilot with the UAV could be a system, a tower communicating with them could be external. Where to draw the line is questionable |
− | ** | + | ** Usualy the definition of autonomy only applies to the UAV system itself |
** Event though there are different definitions of autonomy we set the scope only on an individual plattform | ** Event though there are different definitions of autonomy we set the scope only on an individual plattform | ||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
* Central vs. Decentral controll | * Central vs. Decentral controll | ||
** Central coordination | ** Central coordination | ||
− | *** | + | *** Huge communication overhead |
− | *** | + | *** Huge computational constraints |
** Decentral design | ** Decentral design | ||
*** Some form of coordination and parralelization needs to be there | *** Some form of coordination and parralelization needs to be there | ||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
== Group 3 == | == Group 3 == | ||
− | ==What is a multi-UAV system?== | + | ===What is a multi-UAV system?=== |
* at least two UAVs | * at least two UAVs | ||
* combine information | * combine information | ||
− | ==What are the building blocks of an autonomous multi-UAV system?== | + | ===What are the building blocks of an autonomous multi-UAV system?=== |
* sensing | * sensing | ||
* signal processing | * signal processing | ||
Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
* IN ADDITION: mechanical design and application design blocks | * IN ADDITION: mechanical design and application design blocks | ||
− | ==What are the design challenges?== | + | ===What are the design challenges?=== |
sensor fusion | sensor fusion | ||
* power management | * power management | ||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
− | ==Is autonomy desirable?== | + | ===Is autonomy desirable?=== |
* ... with multi-UAVs, there is no choice | * ... with multi-UAVs, there is no choice | ||
* better, more deterministic performance | * better, more deterministic performance | ||
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
== Group 5 == | == Group 5 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Killer Problems/Enabling factors == | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Enabling factors that emerged in recent years=== | ||
+ | * Cost for UAV systems dropped dramatically | ||
+ | * Image processing SW/HW | ||
+ | * Sensor HW availability | ||
+ | |||
+ | but some prototypes showing basic technology existed 10 years ago... | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Killer problems=== | ||
+ | * Regulation | ||
+ | * Wireless communication spectrum for drones | ||
+ | |||
+ | Provocative claim: Way for solving technological issues is straight. |
Latest revision as of 13:38, 8 July 2013
Group 1
Roland Siegwart, Evsen Yanmaz, Torsten Andre, Christof Hoppe, Michael Rischmuller, István Fehérvári, Wilfried Elmenreich
What is a multi-UAV system?
- airborne
- two or more UAVs, possibly also heterogeneous
- have to share knowledge
- information exchange during operation
- indirect or direct communication
- don't have to share a common objective
- collaboration or coordination
What are the building blocks of an autonomous multi-UAV system?
- networking, some form of communication
- sensing system: cameras, ultra-sonic
- interaction with the environment
- sharing representation
- bottom-up/top-down
- bottom up: team of individuals
- top down: designed as a team
- fail-operational or fail-safe
- swarm of simple systems/swarm with a leader/swarm of highly intelligent systems
What are the design challenges?
- technical challenges, see above
- mission-specific or one system fits all?
- system integration
- legal issues, regulations
- responsibility
- privacy
- public perception, acceptance
Is autonomy desirable? When?
- yes, for a large number of UAVs
- for a large area, remote location
- if problem is well-defined and easy
- no, to avoid legal issues
- if problem is complex, not trackable
Group 2
Definitions
- Autonomy
- Executing tasks within a certain constrained area
- Scale from complete pilot control to complete uav control for decission making
- Autonomy can be defined for various scopes ( from the individual robot to a whole system including the operators)
- A pilot with the UAV could be a system, a tower communicating with them could be external. Where to draw the line is questionable
- Usualy the definition of autonomy only applies to the UAV system itself
- Event though there are different definitions of autonomy we set the scope only on an individual plattform
what is a multi-uav system
- UAV:
- plattform
- (not piloted by a human)
- capable of aerial flight
- moves in 3 Dimensions
- n>1
- can be but does not need to be homogenoeus
- either there must be a common understanding of the task or some form of communication otherwise it is not a system
what are the building blocks of an autonomous multi-UAV system
- Hardware requirements for individual UAVs
- Power supply
- Communication
- Propulsion
- Sensors
- Computation
- System requirements
- Logic/ Control logic / AI
- Flight control system that stablizes the system
- some sort of feedback about the position of sorrounding UAVs is needed for each uav
- Mission control
- Does the mission control need to know about the UAV systems? Like what type of sensors it uses?
- Depending on definition of the system. If the UAV is autonomous or if the whole system is autonomous
what are the design challenges?
- Do we need a sense and avoid system for UAVs? (whatever that means)
- Defining the Terms UAV-System and Autonomy
- Where do we draw the line for a system and what falls under Autonomy
- Decicde where and how a system should learn and abstract
- Central vs. Decentral controll
- Central coordination
- Huge communication overhead
- Huge computational constraints
- Decentral design
- Some form of coordination and parralelization needs to be there
- Communication is a problem
- Competing Robots or collaborating?
- Central coordination
is autonomy desirable? When?
- Not desirable, it's essential
- No conitinouus controll is possible ( communication fails)
- Unpredicted environment changes or internal changes (prop dead)
- Gravity is a problem. if you stand still you drop :)
- multiple UAVs make the problem harder
- As each UAV needs to interact with the environment autonomously it would also need to interact with all the other UAVs (which then are part of the enivornment)
- It would be very hard to controll all of them from a single point
Group 3
What is a multi-UAV system?
- at least two UAVs
- combine information
What are the building blocks of an autonomous multi-UAV system?
- sensing
- signal processing
- actuation
- computation
- control
- power
- power management
- communication
- user interface
- coordination
- cooperation
- appropriate mechanical design
- IN ADDITION: mechanical design and application design blocks
What are the design challenges?
sensor fusion
- power management
- processing power
- redundancy, safety
- heterogeneity of platforms
- interdisciplinary knowledge needed
- strict regulations
- failure robustness
- "self healing"
Is autonomy desirable?
- ... with multi-UAVs, there is no choice
- better, more deterministic performance
Group 4
Group 5
Killer Problems/Enabling factors
Enabling factors that emerged in recent years
- Cost for UAV systems dropped dramatically
- Image processing SW/HW
- Sensor HW availability
but some prototypes showing basic technology existed 10 years ago...
Killer problems
- Regulation
- Wireless communication spectrum for drones
Provocative claim: Way for solving technological issues is straight.