Difference between revisions of "Lab on Self-Organizing Smart Grids"
From Self-Organization Wiki
(→Group 2) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Name: EMMMA (Wil, Martina, Marc, Manfred, Anna) | Name: EMMMA (Wil, Martina, Marc, Manfred, Anna) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * server running central services for various applications (~ 10k€) | ||
| + | * a number of workstations (~ 5k€) | ||
| + | * tablet computers (10 k€) | ||
| + | * model miniatures of a town with interactive buttons (10 k€) | ||
| + | * real-time HIL power system (RTDS) | ||
| + | * Reference installation "Office Setup" (5 k€) | ||
| + | * Wind turbine, photovoltaic system, batteries (25 k€) | ||
| + | * Reference loads (5 k€) | ||
| + | * Software (Smart metering, Labview, ect.) (price strongly depends on license type) | ||
==Group 3== | ==Group 3== | ||
| + | * Participants: Johannes, Andrea, Sven, Oliver, Astrid | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Users of the SG lab=== | ||
| + | * Sensor networks people, distributed system people, ... | ||
| + | * computer scientists interested in the control and communication level of Smart Grids | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===What do they use it for?=== | ||
| + | Evolve our approaches & convince power systems people that our approaches perform well in the actual power system in place | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===We need ...=== | ||
| + | Abstraction layer to speed up deployment to field trials / component or system focussed testing labs | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Grid Simulation or real grid components? === | ||
| + | Simulation: commercial? To some extent, e.g. we could use PowerFactory | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Time scale=== | ||
| + | * Several seconds | ||
| + | * Quasi-static grid simulation | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Concept=== | ||
| + | *Evaluate different communication technologies and protocols to see how appropriate they would be for self-organisation approaches in the Smart Grid | ||
| + | --> Emulation platform (Hardware-in-the-loop) | ||
| + | * Understand dynamics in such a system, get to know the main problems | ||
| + | --> Get the sensor data/simulation results in the needed resolution | ||
| + | * Verify simulations: Close enough to reality: hardware | ||
| + | * Evaluate grid & component coordination | ||
| + | * Real time requirements? | ||
| + | * Easily switch between coordination approaches (conventional / self-organised / hierarchical) to evaluate their performance | ||
| + | --> Layered concept with defined interfaces | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Group 4== | ||
| + | * Participants: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Goal of the Lab=== | ||
| + | *Test whether self-organising solutions can help in: | ||
| + | **achieving better performance | ||
| + | **mastering complexity in control | ||
| + | **robustness of the overall system | ||
| + | *The long-term goal of the lab is providing tools for live-testing of self-organising solutions | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===More in practice=== | ||
| + | *produce hardware/software tools and
social systems to be deployed to prosumers | ||
| + | **must be accepted by users | ||
| + | **must be allowed by providers | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Interdisciplinary=== | ||
| + | *Electrical Engineering | ||
| + | *Informatics | ||
| + | *Information Technology | ||
| + | *Physics | ||
| + | *Sociology | ||
| + | *Economics | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===The Perfect Lab=== | ||
| + | *Provide both simulation tools and experimental platforms | ||
| + | *Seamless transition from simulation to the physical apparatuses and back | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===The Setup of the Lab=== | ||
| + | *Simulation platform | ||
| + | **portable language | ||
| + | **modular | ||
| + | **characterised against physical devices and realistic user behaviour | ||
| + | *Need a cluster computing service for parallel simulation | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===The Setup of the Lab=== | ||
| + | *Playground lab for testing the tools | ||
| + | **Simulating a single household | ||
| + | *Field tests households (about 20) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:04, 21 August 2012
Task:
- Propose a concept for a Lab which supports researchers in the area of self-organizing smart grids
- State the relevant resources (software, hardware, installations) which would be needed for such a lab.
Group 2
Name: EMMMA (Wil, Martina, Marc, Manfred, Anna)
- server running central services for various applications (~ 10k€)
- a number of workstations (~ 5k€)
- tablet computers (10 k€)
- model miniatures of a town with interactive buttons (10 k€)
- real-time HIL power system (RTDS)
- Reference installation "Office Setup" (5 k€)
- Wind turbine, photovoltaic system, batteries (25 k€)
- Reference loads (5 k€)
- Software (Smart metering, Labview, ect.) (price strongly depends on license type)
Group 3
- Participants: Johannes, Andrea, Sven, Oliver, Astrid
Users of the SG lab
- Sensor networks people, distributed system people, ...
- computer scientists interested in the control and communication level of Smart Grids
What do they use it for?
Evolve our approaches & convince power systems people that our approaches perform well in the actual power system in place
We need ...
Abstraction layer to speed up deployment to field trials / component or system focussed testing labs
Grid Simulation or real grid components?
Simulation: commercial? To some extent, e.g. we could use PowerFactory
Time scale
- Several seconds
- Quasi-static grid simulation
Concept
- Evaluate different communication technologies and protocols to see how appropriate they would be for self-organisation approaches in the Smart Grid
--> Emulation platform (Hardware-in-the-loop)
- Understand dynamics in such a system, get to know the main problems
--> Get the sensor data/simulation results in the needed resolution
- Verify simulations: Close enough to reality: hardware
- Evaluate grid & component coordination
- Real time requirements?
- Easily switch between coordination approaches (conventional / self-organised / hierarchical) to evaluate their performance
--> Layered concept with defined interfaces
Group 4
- Participants:
Goal of the Lab
- Test whether self-organising solutions can help in:
- achieving better performance
- mastering complexity in control
- robustness of the overall system
- The long-term goal of the lab is providing tools for live-testing of self-organising solutions
More in practice
- produce hardware/software tools and
social systems to be deployed to prosumers
- must be accepted by users
- must be allowed by providers
Interdisciplinary
- Electrical Engineering
- Informatics
- Information Technology
- Physics
- Sociology
- Economics
The Perfect Lab
- Provide both simulation tools and experimental platforms
- Seamless transition from simulation to the physical apparatuses and back
The Setup of the Lab
- Simulation platform
- portable language
- modular
- characterised against physical devices and realistic user behaviour
- Need a cluster computing service for parallel simulation
The Setup of the Lab
- Playground lab for testing the tools
- Simulating a single household
- Field tests households (about 20)
