Difference between revisions of "Misconceptions"
From Self-Organization Wiki
(→Definition-related Misconceptions) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Definition-related Misconceptions== | ==Definition-related Misconceptions== | ||
===SOS implies evolution=== | ===SOS implies evolution=== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 5: | ||
===Structure is a primary property (but the way how structure was created?)=== | ===Structure is a primary property (but the way how structure was created?)=== | ||
===SO itself is a misconception=== | ===SO itself is a misconception=== | ||
| + | Is “self-organization” itself a misconception? Depends on the line between system and observer. Is everything self-organizing? | ||
===Adaptivity implies SO=== | ===Adaptivity implies SO=== | ||
===Distributed control implies SO=== | ===Distributed control implies SO=== | ||
===Simulated annealing is SO=== | ===Simulated annealing is SO=== | ||
===There is always a global goal=== | ===There is always a global goal=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Misconceptions on applicability== | ||
| + | ===Every problem can be solved by aggregation of local rules=== | ||
| + | ===It is a magical problem solver for engineers=== | ||
| + | ===It is always better than a centralized system=== | ||
| + | ===A SOS never needs maintenance=== | ||
Latest revision as of 15:44, 15 July 2008
Contents
- 1 Definition-related Misconceptions
- 1.1 SOS implies evolution
- 1.2 A system as a whole is SO
- 1.3 SOS are always chaotic
- 1.4 Structure is a primary property (but the way how structure was created?)
- 1.5 SO itself is a misconception
- 1.6 Adaptivity implies SO
- 1.7 Distributed control implies SO
- 1.8 Simulated annealing is SO
- 1.9 There is always a global goal
- 2 Misconceptions on applicability
SOS implies evolution
A system as a whole is SO
SOS are always chaotic
Structure is a primary property (but the way how structure was created?)
SO itself is a misconception
Is “self-organization” itself a misconception? Depends on the line between system and observer. Is everything self-organizing?
