Difference between revisions of "Misconceptions"

From Self-Organization Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: ==Misconceptions on applicability== ===Every problem can be solved by aggregation of local rules=== ===It is a magical problem solver for engineers=== ===It is always better than a central...)
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Misconceptions on applicability==
 
===Every problem can be solved by aggregation of local rules===
 
===It is a magical problem solver for engineers===
 
===It is always better than a centralized system===
 
===A SOS never needs maintenance===
 
 
 
==Definition-related Misconceptions==
 
==Definition-related Misconceptions==
 
===SOS implies evolution===
 
===SOS implies evolution===
 
===A system as a whole is SO===
 
===A system as a whole is SO===
===SO are always chaotic===
+
===SOS are always chaotic===
 
===Structure is a primary property (but the way how structure was created?)===
 
===Structure is a primary property (but the way how structure was created?)===
 
===SO itself is a misconception===
 
===SO itself is a misconception===
 +
Is “self-organization” itself a misconception? Depends on the line between system and observer. Is everything self-organizing?
 
===Adaptivity implies SO===
 
===Adaptivity implies SO===
 
===Distributed control implies SO===
 
===Distributed control implies SO===
 
===Simulated annealing is SO===
 
===Simulated annealing is SO===
 
===There is always a global goal===
 
===There is always a global goal===
 +
 +
==Misconceptions on applicability==
 +
===Every problem can be solved by aggregation of local rules===
 +
===It is a magical problem solver for engineers===
 +
===It is always better than a centralized system===
 +
===A SOS never needs maintenance===

Latest revision as of 15:44, 15 July 2008

Definition-related Misconceptions

SOS implies evolution

A system as a whole is SO

SOS are always chaotic

Structure is a primary property (but the way how structure was created?)

SO itself is a misconception

Is “self-organization” itself a misconception? Depends on the line between system and observer. Is everything self-organizing?

Adaptivity implies SO

Distributed control implies SO

Simulated annealing is SO

There is always a global goal

Misconceptions on applicability

Every problem can be solved by aggregation of local rules

It is a magical problem solver for engineers

It is always better than a centralized system

A SOS never needs maintenance