Difference between revisions of "Adaptation"

From Self-Organization Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: During the corresponding discussion the focus turned to the term adaptibility in this context. When can we say that a component is adaptive? If we consider it as a black box is it importan...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
During the corresponding discussion the focus turned to the term adaptibility in this context. When can we say that a component is adaptive? If we consider it as a black box is it important to distinguish the system in the box between a fully adaptive (eg. knowledge-based) solution or a hard-coded one (like an EPROM)? As an answer the following two terms have been introduced: adaptive behavior and adaptive methodology clearly separating the component's behavior (external) and the workflows inside (internal).
+
==Definition of adaptation==
 +
 
 +
*When can we say that a system is adaptive?
 +
*When can we say that a component is adaptive?
 +
 
 +
==Adaptation of a component==
 +
 
 +
If we consider it as a black box is it important to distinguish the system-in-the-box between a fully adaptive (eg. knowledge-based) solution or a hard-coded one (like an EPROM)? The following two terms should be introduced: adaptive behavior and adaptive methodology clearly separating the component's behavior (external) and the workflows inside (internal).

Latest revision as of 10:18, 24 June 2009

Definition of adaptation

  • When can we say that a system is adaptive?
  • When can we say that a component is adaptive?

Adaptation of a component

If we consider it as a black box is it important to distinguish the system-in-the-box between a fully adaptive (eg. knowledge-based) solution or a hard-coded one (like an EPROM)? The following two terms should be introduced: adaptive behavior and adaptive methodology clearly separating the component's behavior (external) and the workflows inside (internal).