Difference between revisions of "Challenges in Engineering Self-Organizing Systems"
From Self-Organization Wiki
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | * '''Design of emergence''': | ||
+ | ** How to design ''local rules'' achieving the desired ''global properties''? | ||
+ | ** Non-trivial but approaches exist. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Design of the communication / interaction protocol''': | ||
+ | ** Degrees of freedom and adaptability | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Simple versus chaotic behavior''': Can we describe the system state? | ||
+ | ** The state of some self-organizing systems can be easily modeled (firefly sync) | ||
+ | ** The state of other self-organizing systems cannot be modeled, they exhibit chaotic behavior, which makes it impossible to predict future states. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Robustness issues''' | ||
+ | ** Malicious nodes, faults, defects | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''Testing''': | ||
+ | ** It can be very difficult to test a proposed self-organizing system with respect to a given goal (many entities, large operational range, chaotic behavior) | ||
+ | ** Rare events may lead to major global effects. | ||
+ | ** Repeatability of results | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''User aspects''' | ||
+ | ** To what extend can today’s systems be replaced or complemented by self-organizing systems, taking into account | ||
+ | *** constraints and acceptance of the technology and | ||
+ | *** risks for users? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
==Documents from group work== | ==Documents from group work== | ||
* [[Group 2]] | * [[Group 2]] |
Revision as of 14:55, 12 July 2010
- Design of emergence:
- How to design local rules achieving the desired global properties?
- Non-trivial but approaches exist.
- Design of the communication / interaction protocol:
- Degrees of freedom and adaptability
- Simple versus chaotic behavior: Can we describe the system state?
- The state of some self-organizing systems can be easily modeled (firefly sync)
- The state of other self-organizing systems cannot be modeled, they exhibit chaotic behavior, which makes it impossible to predict future states.
- Robustness issues
- Malicious nodes, faults, defects
- Testing:
- It can be very difficult to test a proposed self-organizing system with respect to a given goal (many entities, large operational range, chaotic behavior)
- Rare events may lead to major global effects.
- Repeatability of results
- User aspects
- To what extend can today’s systems be replaced or complemented by self-organizing systems, taking into account
- constraints and acceptance of the technology and
- risks for users?
- To what extend can today’s systems be replaced or complemented by self-organizing systems, taking into account