Difference between revisions of "Challenges in Engineering Self-Organizing Systems"

From Self-Organization Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
* '''Design of emergence''':
 +
** How to design ''local rules'' achieving the desired ''global properties''?
 +
** Non-trivial but approaches exist.
 +
 +
* '''Design of the communication / interaction protocol''':
 +
** Degrees of freedom and adaptability
 +
 +
* '''Simple versus chaotic behavior''': Can we describe the system state?
 +
** The state of some self-organizing systems can be easily modeled (firefly sync)
 +
** The state of other self-organizing systems cannot be modeled, they exhibit chaotic behavior, which makes it impossible to predict future states.
 +
 +
* '''Robustness issues'''
 +
** Malicious nodes, faults, defects
 +
 +
* '''Testing''':
 +
** It can be very difficult to test a proposed self-organizing system with respect to a given goal (many entities, large operational range, chaotic behavior)
 +
** Rare events may lead to major global effects.
 +
** Repeatability of results
 +
 +
* '''User aspects'''
 +
** To what extend can today’s systems be replaced or complemented by self-organizing systems, taking into account
 +
*** constraints and acceptance of the technology and
 +
*** risks for users?
 +
 +
 +
 
==Documents from group work==
 
==Documents from group work==
 
* [[Group 2]]
 
* [[Group 2]]

Revision as of 15:55, 12 July 2010

  • Design of emergence:
    • How to design local rules achieving the desired global properties?
    • Non-trivial but approaches exist.
  • Design of the communication / interaction protocol:
    • Degrees of freedom and adaptability
  • Simple versus chaotic behavior: Can we describe the system state?
    • The state of some self-organizing systems can be easily modeled (firefly sync)
    • The state of other self-organizing systems cannot be modeled, they exhibit chaotic behavior, which makes it impossible to predict future states.
  • Robustness issues
    • Malicious nodes, faults, defects
  • Testing:
    • It can be very difficult to test a proposed self-organizing system with respect to a given goal (many entities, large operational range, chaotic behavior)
    • Rare events may lead to major global effects.
    • Repeatability of results
  • User aspects
    • To what extend can today’s systems be replaced or complemented by self-organizing systems, taking into account
      • constraints and acceptance of the technology and
      • risks for users?


Documents from group work

Examples of self-organizing behavior in technology